Upfront versus Delayed Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients with Acquired Aplastic Anemia: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) as first-line therapy in elderly patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) remains uncertain. While immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is the standard initial treatment for patients aged ≥40 years, recent evidence suggests that upfront alloHCT may offer improved outcomes. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 173 Korean patients aged ≥40 years who underwent alloHCT between 1999 and 2017. Patients received either upfront alloHCT without prior IST (n=66) or delayed alloHCT following IST failure or relapse (n=107). The upfront group had a higher rate of matched sibling donors (78.8% vs. 50.5%, p<0.001) and shorter time to transplant (median, 3.4 vs. 8.3 months; p=0.046). Rates of engraftment, hematopoietic recovery, and acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were comparable. Five-year overall survival was higher in the upfront group (73.5% vs. 56.4%, p=0.059). In multivariate analysis, upfront alloHCT (hazard ratio [HR], 2.476; p=0.004) and ECOG performance status ≤1 (HR, 4.736; p<0.001) were independently associated with improved survival. These findings suggest that upfront alloHCT may be a viable first-line option for selected elderly AA patients and support re-evaluation of treatment algorithms that currently prioritize IST.

Article activity feed