Comparison of ultrasound-guided two-step tract dilation versus fluoroscopic dilation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: safety and efficacy outcomes

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction: Fluoroscopy has been the most widely used guidance method for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL); however, radiation exposure is a significant concern. In recent years, ultrasound has gained popularity, offering several advantages. Methods : We retrospectively evaluated the data of patients from March 2019 to October 2023, dividing them into two groups: Group 1, two-step totally ultrasound-guided dilation, and Group 2, fluoroscopy-guided dilation. The objective was to establish the safety and effectiveness of this two-step dilation technique. Results : We included 148 patients, 83 in group 1 and 65 in group 2, with a mean BMI of 29.7kg/m 2 . Mean stone burden was 4,773mm 3 , 55.4% were complex stones. 59.5% of cases without hydronephrosis in the targeted calyx. Fluoroscopy was absent in group 1 and 25.42 ± 19.6 seconds in group 2 (p<0.001). Surgical time was 120 (90-177.5) minutes, with no difference between the two groups. Complications were present in 12.8% of the cases. Group 1 patients had a lower complication rate than those in Group 2 (10.8% and 15.3%, respectively, p = 0.27). We had a global stone-free rate of 73.6%, group 1: 73.8%, and group 2: 73.5% (p=1.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that stone-free rate is associated with the stone location (p=0.005), calyx punctured (p=0.040) and number of tracts (p=0.044). Conclusions : Ultrasound-guided PCNL is a safe and effective technique, offering a similar stone-free rate compared to fluoroscopy and providing an alternative method to avoid radiation exposure during PCNL.

Article activity feed