Comparison of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced MRI and contrast-enhanced CT evaluation of liver tumors: A prospective study
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Purpose This prospective study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of hepatic lesions detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) and gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI), including the incidence of false-positive lesions. We also examined the characteristics of equivocal lesions. Methods In each patient undergoing hepatectomy for a liver tumor, two radiologists (readers A and B) assessed CE-CT and Gd-EOB-MRI. Hepatic lesions were scored as 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, which corresponded to categorization as benign, probably benign, equivocal, probably malignant, or malignant, respectively. Those scored as 1 or 2 were defined as benign and those scored as 4 or 5 were defined as malignant. The lesions left unresected were confirmed as benign when they remained unchanged for ≥ 1 year after hepatectomy. The false-positive rate was defined as the number of lesions finally confirmed as benign among those assessed as malignant before surgery. Results Among the 105 enrolled patients (colorectal liver metastases, 72; hepatocellular carcinoma, 29; other, 4), 886 lesions were recognized on either CT or MRI before surgery; another 26 lesions were identified only on intraoperative ultrasonography or pathologic examination of the surgical specimen. The sensitivity of malignant lesion detection was significantly higher for Gd-EOB-MRI than CE-CT for both reader A (90.3% vs. 68.3%; P < 0.001) and reader B (88.1% vs. 70.2%; P < 0.001). The false-positive rate with CE-CT and Gd-EOB-MRI was 2.3% and 3.7%, respectively, for reader A (P = 0.580), and 0.5% and 4.2%, respectively, for reader B (P = 0.033). The size of false-positive lesions was comparable with that of correctly diagnosed malignant lesions except in reader B’s Gd-EOB-MRI evaluation (false-positive vs. correct; median, 7 mm vs. 13 mm; P = 0.015) Conclusion Gd-EOB-MRI was superior to CE-CT for detecting liver lesions. The false-positive rate was low for both modalities.