Tidal volume delivery during chest compression with either an endotracheal tube or supraglottic airway in a porcine animal model

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose: The 2023 Consensus of Science and Treatment Recommendations states that a supraglottic airway (SGA) device can be used to deliver positive pressure ventilation. However, it is unclear if a SGA can effectively be used during chest compressions. We aimed to compare tidal volume (V T ) delivery during either chest compressions with sustained inflations (CC+SI) or 3:1 compression-to-ventilation (3:1 C:V) technique with SGA and endotracheal tube (ETT) using various ventilation devices: T-piece, self-inflating bag (SIB), flow-inflating bag (FIB), NextStep TM resuscitator. Methods: Randomized crossover animal trial using seven mixed-breed piglets (1-3 days old; 1.8-2.4 kg). Piglets were euthanized to eliminate any potential interference with gasping or spontaneous breathing, and randomized to a sequence of resuscitation techniques: 1) CC+SI with T-piece, 2) CC+SI with FIB, 3) CC+SI with SIB, 4) CC+SI with NextStep TM , 5) 3:1 C:V with T-piece, 6) 3:1 C:V with FIB, and 7) 3:1 C:V with SIB. Resuscitation was performed for 1 min per technique via the SGA and then ETT. Respiratory parameters were recorded. Results: Resuscitation using an ETT and CC+SI resulted in a gain in V T , irrespective of ventilation device. In contrast, resuscitation with an ETT or SGA and 3:1 C:V resulted in a loss in V T across all ventilation devices. There was substantial leak with the SGA, regardless of the ventilation device or compression technique. Conclusions: Using the CC+SI technique for resuscitation paired with an ETT resulted in V T gain, regardless of ventilation device. Substantial leak during chest compressions with a SGA may hinder effective V T delivery.

Article activity feed