Long-term Outcomes of Radical Resection vs. Combined Subtotal Resection and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Large Vestibular Schwannomas

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: This study compares the long-term outcomes of radical resection versus subtotal removal followed by Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery for large vestibular schwannomas (VS), focusing on tumor control and neurological function preservation. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 87 patients with large VS (Koos grade III–IV) was conducted. Patients were divided into radical resection (Group R, n = 40) and subtotal removal followed by GK (Group C, n = 47). Tumor volume reduction, facial nerve function, hearing preservation, and other neurological outcomes were evaluated. Results: Group C had significantly larger tumor preoperatively (median: 10.8 cm³ vs. 7.9 cm³, p  = 0.002). Despite this, facial nerve function was better preserved in Group C than in Group R (House-Brackmann > 3: 19% vs. 30%), and the incidence of non-serviceable hearing (> 50 dB) was less frequent in Group C (72% vs. 88%) immediately after surgery. Trigeminal dysesthesia improved in Group C (32–26%) but worsened in Group R (28–38%). Ataxia was more common in Group C (final: 19% vs. 3%, p  < 0.001), likely due to larger tumor size. Tumor control was achieved in both groups, with a 95.7% reduction in Group R and a 69.5% reduction in Group C ( p  < 0.0001). VP shunt placement was more frequent in Group C than in Group R (19% vs. 5%). Failure of tumor control was observed only in Group C, where 4% of patients required salvage surgery and 2% underwent additional Gamma Knife treatment. Conclusion: Subtotal removal with GK balances tumor control and neurological preservation in large VS. Despite larger tumors, this treatment approach demonstrated better long-term facial nerve and hearing outcomes than radical resection.

Article activity feed