Social vulnerability and the risk of respiratory virus infection in households: a case-ascertained study

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objectives This study examines whether the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a location-based composite measure of social vulnerability, is associated with the risk of SARS-CoV-2 or influenza infection within households. Study design: Prospective cohort case-ascertained household transmission study Methods We analyzed data from a case-ascertained household transmission study conducted across multiple U.S. sites (September 2021–May 2023). Household contacts of index cases with confirmed infections collected nasal swabs daily for ten days, tested via RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 or influenza. Age, sex, and vaccine receipt were self-reported, with vaccination verified. Household addresses were geocoded to 2020 census tracts and linked to the national SVI percentile. Using modified Poisson regression models with generalized estimating equations, we assessed associations between census tract-level SVI and infection risk, adjusting for age, sex, vaccine receipt, and clustering by census tract. Participants included household contacts of index cases with SARS-CoV-2 (793 households, 1,408 participants) or influenza (273 households, 512 participants). Results We found that higher overall SVI was associated with increased SARS-CoV-2 infection risk (adjusted Incidence Rate Ratio [aIRR] 1.18; 95% CI: 1.02–1.36). Specifically, the socioeconomic and racial/ethnic minority SVI domains were linked to higher infection risk (aIRR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.06–1.41 and aIRR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.04–1.46, respectively). Other SVI domains were not statistically significant. For influenza, SVI was associated with greater infection risk but was not statistically significant (aIRR = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.85–1.53). Conclusions Household contacts of SARS-CoV-2 index cases in high-SVI areas faced increased infection risk. No significant association was found for influenza, likely due to the small sample size. Increased access to SARS-CoV-2 testing, treatment, and preventive measures (e.g., masking, handwashing, isolation) may be especially important in high-SVI areas.

Article activity feed