Development and validation of a frailty assessment-based competing risk model for predicting cancer-specific survival in elderly patients with gastric cancer: a dual-center cohort study

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Frailty serves as a critical determinant of clinical outcomes in elderly cancer patients. Nevertheless, there remains a paucity of ‌rigorously validated prognostic tools‌ that account for frailty heterogeneity in older adults with gastric cancer (GC). This multicenter investigation enrolled 1,278 consecutive GC patients aged ≥ 70 years treated between January 2015 and December 2022 across two geographically distinct Chinese cohorts: the Xi'an Cohort (n = 934) and Yulin Cohort (n = 344). ‌Using stratified randomization‌, the Xi'an cohort was partitioned into training (n = 653) and internal validation (n = 281) sets at a 7:3 ratio, while the Yulin cohort provided ‌external validation‌. Frailty status was systematically assessed using the validated 5-Item Modified Frailty Index. ‌Competing risks regression analysis‌ identified significant predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the training cohort. Based on the risk factors, predictive models to predict patients’ 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS were constructed. ‌Model performance‌ was rigorously evaluated through multiple metrics: the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), Harrell's concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Multivariable analysis revealed ‌severe frailty‌ as an independent CSS predictor (subdistribution hazard ratio = 2.84, 95% CI: 2.04–3.96; P  < 0.001). ‌The frailty-incorporated competing risk model demonstrated superior predictive performance‌, achieving AUC values of 0.838 (training), 0.846 (internal validation), and 0.841 (external validation) - ‌surpassing conventional prognostic models‌. Concordantly, the model attained the highest C-indices across all validation sets (training: 0.771; internal: 0.784; external: 0.784). Calibration plots showed ‌excellent agreement‌ between predicted and observed outcomes, while DCA confirmed ‌enhanced clinical utility‌ across relevant risk thresholds. These findings establish that ‌frailty-adapted prognostic modeling‌ significantly improves survival prediction accuracy in elderly GC patients. Our results underscore the imperative of ‌comprehensive frailty assessment‌ in clinical decision-making and risk stratification for this vulnerable population.

Article activity feed