A novel serum-based steroid-protein panels for differentiating ovarian cancer from non-malignant adnexal masses

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecological malignancy, largely due to the advanced stage at diagnosis in most patients. This study investigates whether systemic steroids can serve as biomarkers to distinguish malignant ovarian tumors from non-malignant adnexal masses. Methods This prospective, single-center observational study included 99 women with adnexal masses who underwent surgery between December 2021 and February 2025. Preoperative serum levels of 17 steroid hormones—including androgens, 11-oxyandrogens, glucocorticoids, and mineralocorticoids—were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Machine learning was employed to assess the diagnostic potential of these steroids in distinguishing ovarian cancer (n = 43) from non-malignant adnexal masses (n = 56). Results Patients with ovarian cancer had lower levels of 11β-hydroxy-testosterone (11OHT), 11-keto-testosterone (11KT), and testosterone compared to those with non-malignant adnexal masses. Using stepwise feature selection, we developed two diagnostic models incorporating three 11-oxyandrogens (11KT, 11OHT, and 11β-hydroxy-androstenedione), patient age, and either cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) or human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) for distinguishing malignant from non-malignant adnexal masses. The model including CA-125 achieved AUC of 0.907, 88.9% sensitivity and 82.0% specificity, while the model including HE4 achieved AUC of 0.911, 94.4% sensitivity and 77.3% specificity as evaluated by cross-validation. Both models significantly outperformed CA-125, HE4, and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) index alone. Conclusion Patients with ovarian cancer exhibit distinct steroid profiles compared to those with non-malignant adnexal masses. If validated, the models could enhance diagnosis, reducing unnecessary surgeries for benign conditions while ensuring timely treatment for ovarian cancer, particularly when conventional biomarkers are inconclusive.

Article activity feed