Theoretical treatment of tension transients in muscle following sudden changes in orthophosphate concentration – implications for energy transduction

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The relative timing of the force-generating power stroke and release of the ATP-hydrolysis product ortophosphate (Pi) in actomyosin energy transduction is debated. It may be explored by studying the tension response to sudden changes in [Pi] during isometric muscle contraction (Pi-transients; rate constant k Pi ) and the initial rate of force rise (k tr ) at varied [Pi]. Most such studies are interpreted using simple kinetic schemes, ignoring the range of elastic strains of actin-attached myosin cross-bridges. Unfortunately, we found that the only simple scheme which accounts for the experimental findings of single exponential Pi-transients with k Pi ≈ k tr has force-generation coincident with actin-myosin attachment preventing the high power output of muscle. We therefore turned to a mechanokinetic model, allowing consideration of the varying elastic cross-bridge strains. Our model assumes Pi-release between cross-bridge attachment and the power stroke but power strokes only occur if cross-bridges attach in a pre-power-stroke state with zero or negative elastic strain (counteracting shortening). The model suggests two components of the Pi-transients. One is attributed to slow cross-bridge detachment from the pre-power-stroke state at positive elastic strain upon Pi-binding. The other is due to Pi-induced shifts in equilibrium with rapid power stroke reversal. The slow component dominates for all parameter values tested but the fast component is ubiquitous, predicting a biphasic Pi-transient in disagreement with experiments. Strikingly, however, the mechanokinetic model gives entirely different predictions than apparently similar simple kinetic schemes and we do not rule out the existence of parameter values with negligible fast component. Otherwise we show that the assumption of secondary Pi-binding sites on myosin outside the active site removes the fast component albeit without predicting that k tr ≈ k Pi . Additional studies are required to finally corroborate that k tr ≈ k Pi in experiments but also to further develop mechanokinetic models combined with multistep Pi-release.

Article activity feed