Multiple-classifier endometrial cancers: the first multicenter clinicopathological study from five Polish institutions

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction: Endometrial cancer (EC) exhibits molecular heterogeneity, classified into four subtypes: POLEmut (POLE ultramutated), MMRd (mismatch repair deficient), p53abn (p53 abnormal), and NSMP (no specific molecular profile). Tumors with multiple classifiers (multiple-classifier ECs) challenge risk stratification, particularly MMRd-p53abn and POLEmut-related subtypes. Method: This study aims to assess the prevalence and clinicopathological features of multiple-classifier ECs, focusing on MMRd-p53abn versus classical MMRd and p53abn, and their ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk group alignment. Results: We analyzed 1205 EC patients from five Polish oncology centers, molecularly profiled post-surgery. Subtypes included MMRd, p53abn, POLEmut, and multiple-classifier groups (MMRd-p53abn, POLEmut-p53abn, POLEmut-MMRd, POLEmut-MMRd-p53abn). Histotype, grade, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, and risk groups classification were assessed. Multiple-classifier ECs comprised 7.5% (90/1205), with MMRd-p53abn at 4.2% (51/1205), POLEmut-p53abn 0.3% (4/1205), POLEmut-MMRd 1.9% (23/1205), and POLEmut-MMRd-p53abn 1.0% (12/1205). MMRd-p53abn tumors showed more non-endometrioid histology (9.8% vs 2.86%, p=0.035), high-grade (G3) tumors (27.45% vs 12.14%, p=0.005), and assignment to high-intermediate or high-risk (HIR/HR) groups (62.75% vs 37.50%, p=0.001) than MMRd, but less non-endometrioid histology than p53abn (9.8% vs 35.63%, p=0.001). POLEmut-p53abn tumors had higher G3 (75.00% vs 5.88%, p=0.005) and more FIGO III-IV stages (75.00% vs 5.88%, p=0.005) than POLEmut. Conclusions: MMRd-p53abn tumors are more aggressive than MMRd yet less adverse than p53abn, while POLEmut-p53abn diverge from POLEmut’s favorable prognosis. Their frequent assignment to high-intermediate or high-risk (HIR/HR) groups suggests refined risk stratification is needed. As Poland’s first multi-center EC study, these data may inform future guidelines.

Article activity feed