Shall we add some meaning? Investigating useful single-item extensions to the short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale for national public health surveillance

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Monitoring mental well-being at thenational level has become increasingly important and widespread. However, the type and scope of mental well-being measurement are highly diverse, to the disadvantage of comparability. By taking actual recommendations on how to measure well-being at the national level into account, the present study aimed to identify a multicomponent mental well-being measure suitable for regular nationwide surveillance and cross-national comparability. Methods In a sample of 2,614 participants who were equally balanced across age (18-29, 30-44, 45-59, 60-74 years), sex (male, female) and educational groups (low, moderate, high), we investigated the additional value of combining the seven-item Short Warwick-Edinburgh Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) with the most frequently used single-item measures of mental well-being (i.e., happiness, satisfaction with life and meaning of life, which reflect the components of hedonia, eudaimonia and interpersonal well-being, respectively). Additionally, we investigated the factor structure of the ten-item composite measure. Results The results replicated the assumed three-factor structure of the SWEMWBS and suggested a fourth factor comprising the three single items as well as a higher-order general well-being factor. Overall, the results indicated the appropriateness of a composite score as a macroindicatorof mental well-being as well as a decomposed analysis of the hedonic and eudaimonic components or single-item measurements of mental well-being, which would enable more differentiated insights and maximal comparability. Meaning of life showed the highest added value, thus indicating its distinctiveness among the components of mental well-being. Conclusions The results show how a highly comparable comprehensive yet economical measurement of mental well-being is possible in large-scale assessments. The addition of three of the most popular single items - happiness, satisfaction with life and meaning of life - to the more rigorous measure of wellbeing via the WEMWBS not only ensures comparability but also allows for a more comprehensive understanding of wellbeing. Regular public surveillance of mental well-being indicators can provide insights regarding the application, differentiation, reliability and sensitivity to change of these measurements over time and help guide public health action measures.

Article activity feed