Muscle Strength, Muscle Morphology, and Oxidative Capacity in Normal Weight versus Overweight and Obese Youth: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) defined youth overweight and obesity as pandemic due to a large global overweight and obesity prevalence of 14.8% and 8.1% in 2023. However, the impact of overweight and obesity on youth muscle strength, morphology, and oxidative capacity is unclear despite increased research efforts. Objective: To systematically review the literature and meta-analyze findings on muscle strength, morphology, and oxidative capacity in youth with overweight and/or obesity (OW) versus those with normal-weight (NW). Methods : Following PRISMA guidelines, electronic databases (i.e., PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, MEDLINE) were searched for cross-sectional studies that compared OW with NW regarding the outcomes muscle strength (e.g., absolute, relative [e.g., to fat-free mass, body mass]), morphology (e.g., muscle cross-sectional area [CSA]), and oxidative capacity (e.g., phase II of volume of oxygen [VO 2 ] kinetics). The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute 8-item checklist. A random-effects three-level meta-analysis was used, and within- as well as between-group effect sizes (Hedges’ g [g]) were computed. Study heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. The Grading Recommendation Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Results : Overall, 15 studies were meta-analyzed, including 1,475 participants aged 8.4 to 16.6 years. The mean RoB amounted to 6.1 on a 0 to 8 scale. Muscle absolute strength (n=346; g=0.68; p=0.011; I 2 =59.3% [p<0.001]) and CSA (n=1,024; g=1.12; p<0.001; I 2 =73% [p<0.001]) was significantly greater in OW versus NW. However, relative muscle strength tended to be larger in NW versus OW (n=320; g=-0.455; p=0.165; I 2 =92.7% [p<0.001]). Moreover, muscle oxidative capacity was significantly greater in NW versus OW (n=105; g=-0.58; p=0.019; I 2 =37.5% [p=0.18]). GRADE revealed very low (absolute and relative strength and muscle oxidative capacity) to moderate (muscle CSA) certainty of evidence. Conclusions : Absolute muscle strength and CSA seem larger, while relative muscle strength and muscle oxidative capacity seem lower in OW versus NW. The chronic overload imposed by overweight/obesity might lead to greater absolute strength and CSA, although with lower relative muscle strength, suggesting impaired muscle quality related to overweight/obesity. Moreover, impaired oxidative capacity might indicate muscle mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired oxygen supply, with a potential negative impact on exercise tolerance. However, until more high-quality research becomes available, the rather low certainty of evidence precludes a more robust interpretation of findings.

Article activity feed