Prediction of Cycloplegic Refractive Error based on Non-Cycloplegic Measurements in Chinese Children aged 3 to 17 years

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction Cycloplegic refraction remains the gold standard for pediatric refractive assessment, yet its implementation faces challenges in large-scale studies. This study aimed to develop a multivariable model predicting cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SER) using non-cycloplegic measurements in Chinese children. Methods This retrospective study included 28901 children aged 3–17 years, who were allocated to development (n = 23121) and validation (n = 5780) datasets. Ocular biometric parameters were assessed with the IOL Master 500 optical biometer. Cycloplegic SER was measured using a Topcon autorefractor after 1% cyclopentolate. A prediction model was derived and validated, with performance evaluated by R 2 , correlation coefficient, mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), and clinical accuracy proportions (predictions within ± 0.50 D/±1.00 D). Results The prediction model, incorporating age, gender, height, axial length, and axial length/corneal radius of curvature ratio, achieved R 2  = 0.854 (development) and 0.858 (validation), with ME = 0.00 ± 0.72 D and MAE = 0.56 ± 0.46 D in the validation dataset. Clinical accuracy proportions (± 0.50 D/±1.00 D) were 53.86% and 84.91%, respectively. Optimal performance was observed in children aged 3–10 years and those with cycloplegic SER between + 0.50 and + 2.00 D. Conclusions This prediction model based on simplified non-cycloplegic parameters provides reasonably accurate cycloplegic SER estimates in young children with low refractive error. It holds potential for epidemiological surveys in resource-limited settings and clinical management of children with cycloplegia contraindications. Clinical trial number not applicable.

Article activity feed