Aneurysm CaRe – Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation versus Standard Care After Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background & Aims Abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms (A/TAA) are a major cause of mortality in older adults. Most deaths post-A/TAA repair result from cardiovascular events, which may be preventable with cardiac rehabilitation (CR) – a multidisciplinary approach to cardiovascular recovery. The feasibility and acceptability of CR in A/TAA patients remain unknown. Methods This 1:1, non-blinded feasibility randomised trial compared CR to standard care (SC) after elective A/TAA repair at two UK tertiary centres. Patients <50 years, diagnosed with connective tissue disorders, or deemed too unfit for CR were excluded at screening. The CR group followed an 8-week structured programme focusing on medical risk reduction, supervised exercise, and lifestyle modification. Co-primary outcomes were enrolment (target: 60.0%) and CR compliance (target: 70.0%). Secondary outcomes included major cardiac events, cardiovascular biomarkers, echocardiography, lifestyle, and quality of life metrics. This trial was supported by a British Heart Foundation Grant (PG/13/98/30490). Results From September 2014 – September 2015, 159 patients were screened, 97 were eligible, and 68 (70.1%) were randomised (SC: 34, CR: 34). CR adherence was 61.8% (n=21), with 13 withdrawals, primarily due to travel and personal commitments (69.2%). At 36 weeks, CR participants maintained higher physical activity levels (40 min vs. 30 min, p = 0.042). Conclusion Recruiting patients after A/TAA repair to CR is feasible, with good adherence. Virtual or video-based CR may help overcome barriers related to accessing CR. Trial registration ISRCTN (65746249).