Fluoroscopic examination of stomach shapes after sleeve gastrectomy: Implications for long-term weight loss and esophagitis

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction: Stomach morphology influences laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) outcomes, including weight loss and gastroesophageal reflux. This study examined the impact of stomach shape on long-term weight loss and esophagitis post-LSG. Methods: We analyzed 162 patients who underwent LSG. Stomach shape was categorized into three subgroups based on postoperative fluoroscopy contrast pooling: upper and lower portions (ULP), lower portion (LP), and smooth flow (SF) postoperatively. Short-term operative outcomes, surgical procedures, five-year weight loss, and esophagitis, diagnosed by upper endoscopy using the L A classifications, were compared across groups. Results: The stomach shape distribution was ULP (12%), LP (29%), and SF (59%)). Operative outcomes were generally comparable; however, ULP tended to exhibit smaller bougie sizes (ULP: 31.8±9.7 vs. LP: 34.3±6.4 vs. SF: 34.4±6.3 cm). Preoperative assessments revealed no Grade C esophagitis, with most patients exhibiting normal findings. Post-LSG clinical changes were comparable, although de novo esophagitis was more frequent in the SF shape (ULP vs. LP vs. SF, de novo/improved/persistent/worsened, 10%/ 0% 84%/ 6% vs. 21%/ 0% 72% 6% vs. 31%/ 4%/ 60%/4%, respectively; p=0.24). Weight loss after LSG was compared, and no significant differences were observed among the groups; however, LP tended to maintain total weight loss (TWL) at 5 years (TWL%: ULP vs. LP vs. SF; 21.3±3.9 vs. 23.1±7.4 vs. 21.5 ±8.8 %, respectively; p=0.859). Conclusion: Patients with SF had the highest de novo esophagitis incidence. The LP shape was linked with sustained long-term weight loss. Therefore, creating an LP shape should be the optimal surgical objective.

Article activity feed