Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: Evaluation of Preventive Strategies Based on Serum Creatinine and Cystatin C in Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Kidney Disease – A Randomized Clinical Trial

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) remains a clinically relevant complication, with uncertainties regarding its true epidemiology, pathophysiology, optimal diagnostic methods, and preventive strategies. As the global volume of contrast-enhanced imaging procedures continues to rise, there is a critical need to refine early detection and prevention approaches. Methods This prospective, randomized clinical trial included patients with peripheral artery disease requiring contrast-enhanced diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures at a public hospital from February 2022 to March 2024. Patients were stratified into three groups based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): control group (eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73m²), Group 1 (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m²), and Group 2 (eGFR 30–59 mL/min/1.73m²). Within each group, patients were randomized into either a standard hydration protocol ( 1 mL/kg/h for 12 hours before and 12 hours after the procedure ) or an intervention protocol , which included atorvastatin (80 mg 12 hours before and 40 mg after the procedure) and oral N-acetylcysteine (600 mg every 12 hours, starting 24 hours before and continuing for 24 hours after the procedure), in addition to intravenous isotonic saline hydration. Serum creatinine (sCr) and cystatin C (sCys C) levels were measured at baseline, 24h, and 72h post-procedure. Results A total of 76 patients were included: 45 in the control group, 23 in Group 2, and 8 in Group 3 . There were no significant differences in baseline clinical or demographic characteristics between groups. Although numerically more CI-AKI cases were identified using sCys C, it did not demonstrate statistically significant superiority over sCr as a diagnostic biomarker (Kappa = 0.07, p = 0.554). In the control group , logistic regression analysis showed that the intervention was associated with a lower incidence of CI-AKI when sCys C was used as the diagnostic criterion (OR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65–0.98; p = 0.025). However, this effect was not statistically significant in patients with impaired renal function. Factorial ANOVA and dispersion analysis did not confirm a significant effect of the intervention across groups or its interaction with renal function status when evaluating variations in both sCys C and sCr (p > 0.05). Conclusions When using sCys C as a diagnostic criterion, the combination of high-dose atorvastatin and N-acetylcysteine demonstrated a protective effect against CI-AKI in patients with normal renal function . However, this benefit was not observed in patients with moderate or severe chronic kidney disease, regardless of the biomarker used (sCr or sCys C). Furthermore, despite identifying more CI-AKI cases, sCys C did not exhibit statistically significant superiority over sCr for early CI-AKI diagnosis.

Article activity feed