Reproducibility and accuracy of non-contrast abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging of the liver in surveillance for early recurrence for hepatocellular carcinoma in a Western population: a multi-reader study

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose : Abbreviated MRI (AMRI) protocols may represent an alternative to conventional MRI (CMRI) for surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to compare the inter-reader agreement and sensitivity of AMRI versus CMRI for HCC recurrence <2 years after curative ablation in at risk-population. Methods : Eight radiologists (4 with <5 years’ and 4 with ≥5 years’ experience) from three institutions independently reviewed 143 CMRI and AMRI image sets from 75 consecutive cirrhotic patients (84% HCV and/or alcohol-related) undergoing secondary screening after HCC ablation with ≥1 month between readings. We calculated the intra and inter-reader agreement by means Gwet’s AC1 for detection of local recurrence at the ablation site, new intrahepatic, and any type of recurrence (either local and/or new intrahepatic) with CMRI and AMRI. Reference diagnoses of recurrent HCC were based on histological or imaging-based criteria. Results : Early HCC recurrence was detected in 37 patients (49.3%). AC1 agreement was similarly high for AMRI and CMRI for local recurrence [0.87 (0.83‒0.90) vs. 0.87 (0.83‒0.92)], but higher for AMRI than for CMRI for new intrahepatic [0.85 (0.81‒0.9) vs. 0.6 (0.52‒0.67)] and any type [0.73 (0.67‒0.78) vs. 0.56 (0.49‒0.64)] recurrences. Sensitivity for detecting any type of HCC recurrence was higher for CMRI [0.83 (0.78‒0.87) vs. 0.39 (0.33‒0.45) for AMRI, p<0.0001]. Conclusions: For early detection of HCC recurrence in a cohort with predominantly HCV and/or alcohol-related cirrhosis, non-contrast AMRI yielded better interobserver agreement but lower sensitivity than CMRI.

Article activity feed