Comparative analysis of gingival crevicular fluid and peri-implant crevicular fluid by mid-infrared spectroscopy: A split mouth study
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objectives: This proof-of-concept study aimed to compare the biochemical composition of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) under healthy conditions, through mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy. Materials and Methods: Using a split-mouth design, GCF and PICF samples were collected from 12 participants and analyzed through MIR spectroscopy. Advanced chemometric models, including partial least squares-discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbors, and support vector machine discriminant analysis, were applied to explore potential biochemical differences between the biofluids. Results: The results indicated no significant biochemical differences between GCF and PICF, with all supervised models demonstrating low prediction accuracy. While no statistically significant differences were observed, subtle spectral variations in PICF suggested a slightly increased lipidic content and the presence of ethers and glycosidic bonds associated with carbohydrates. Conclusions: The lack of significant biochemical differences between GCF and PICF under healthy conditions, as determined by MIR spectroscopy, suggests that implant-related changes in PICF composition are negligible. Clinical Relevance: The demonstrated biochemical similarity between GCF and PICF under healthy conditions reinforces the potential of PICF as a reliable biofluid for diagnostic applications, including monitoring oral and systemic health biomarkers, without significant influence from implant-related factors.