Oncological Outcomes of Primary Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Focal Cryotherapy. Does Gleason Impact Results?
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Purpose Focal cryotherapy is a minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa), but its medium-term oncological outcomes, particularly in relation to baseline Gleason Grade Group (GG), remain understudied. This study evaluates its efficacy and the impact of baseline Gleason score on recurrence-free survival. Methods A retrospective analysis included 111 patients with localized PCa treated with focal cryotherapy between 2014 and January 2025. Patients with prior treatments or follow-up < 12 months were excluded. All patients underwent MRI and transperineal biopsy, with cryotherapy performed using the Visual ICE Cryoablation System. Confirmatory biopsies were recommended at 12–24 months post-treatment. Recurrence was classified as in-field (treated or adjacent areas) or out-field (non-adjacent areas). Any recurrence-free survival was defined as the absence of positive biopsy or additional treatment, while radical treatment-free survival was defined as the absence of whole-gland treatment (e.g., radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy), androgen deprivation therapy, metastasis, or death. Outcomes were compared between patients with baseline GG 1 and GG > 1. Results Median follow-up was 35 months (IQR 24–49). Confirmatory biopsies were performed in 78% of patients (n = 87), revealing in-field recurrence in 14% and out-field recurrence in 23%. No significant differences in recurrence rates were observed between GG 1 and GG > 1 patients (p = 0.9 for in-field; p = 0.8 for out-field). The 3-year any recurrence-free and radical treatment-free survival rates were 63% and 85%, respectively, with no significant variation by baseline GG. Conclusion Focal cryotherapy demonstrates favorable medium-term oncological outcomes for localized PCa, with no significant differences in recurrence-free survival based on baseline Gleason score. These findings support its role as a viable treatment option for patients seeking to minimize treatment-related morbidity.