To investigate the current evidence in post-operative outcomes to support the use of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic (radical) Prostatectomy (RALP) over Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) in cases of organ-confined prostate cancer

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the current evidence in post-operative outcomes to support the use of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic (radical) Prostatectomy (RALP) over Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) in cases of organ-confined prostate cancer. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA/MOOSE guidelines. Dichotomous variables were pooled as odds ratios (OR). Continuous variables were pooled as weighted mean differences (WMD). Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa score (NOS). Results: Four suitable randomised controlled studies were identified from the literature. 1026 male patients with prostate cancer (LRP n=342, 33.33%; RALP n= 684, 66.67%) were identified as eligible for inclusion. These patients were randomised for definitive operative management to RALP or LRP. There was no statistically significant difference identified in operative time (MD -2.81, 95% CI -12.92 – 7.31, I 2 = 77%, P = 0.59). There was no statistically significant difference identified in operative blood-loss (MD -9.34, 95% CI -55.81 +37.12, I 2 = 77%, P = 0.69). There was no statistically significant difference identified in biochemical recurrence free rates at 12 months. Statistically significant differences were identified in meta-analysis of post-operative urinary continence, and post-operative potency. These favoured RALP over LRP. No statistically significant difference was identified in operative time, operative blood-loss, or biochemical recurrence free rates at 12 months. Conclusion: There is an statistically significant improved post-operative profile of patients having undergone RALP v LRP, in particular with respect to return of sexual function and urinary continence. There was no statistical difference identified in intra-operative blood-loss, perioperative complications, or operative time.

Article activity feed