Can Epstein–Barr virus-deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Induction chemotherapy (IC) with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF), combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), has been shown to improve survival in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) . Our previous study demonstrated that adjusting the number of IC cylces based on TNM stage and Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV-DNA) load after IC did not compromise efficacy while reducing toxicity. However, due to the small sample size, there is a need for further confirmation of the long-term outcomes . Methods: This retrospective analysis evaluated the clinical data and survival outcomes of patients with stage III–IVaLA-NPC treated with TPF IC followed by CCRT. Patients in the conventional treatment group received three standard cycles of TPF IC an d CCRT, while those in the experimental group had IC cycles determined by EBV-DNA clearance . If EBV-DNA was undetectable after a certain IC course, subsequent IC was stopped, and CCRT commenced. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed at a ratio of 1:4 to balance baseline characteristics. Survival outcomes between the two groups were compared. Results: A total of 730 patients were included , and 481 patients were successfully matched into 106 pairs . The median followed-up duration was 116months. The 5-year survival outcomes before and after matching, respectively, were as follows: distant metastasis-free survival (89 .3%vs.87.6%, P=0.52/ 87.9% vs . 87.6%, P=0.886), local recurrence-free survival (90 .3%vs. 81.9%, P=0.015/88 .8% vs . 81.9%, P=0.069),progression-free survival (81 . 1%vs . 68.7%, P=0.003/78.5%vs .68.7%, P=0.033), and overall survival (85 .9% vs . 85.3%, P=0.795 / 84.4%vs.85.3%, P=0.870) . Conclusions: This study addresses an important clinical question about the use of EBV-DNA as a marker for optimizing IC in LA-NPC patients, and presents promising findings that could enhance patient outcomes.The results provides a valuable foundation for future research but requires further confirmation through well-designed prospective trials. Trial registration : This is a retrospective study without registration for prospective clinical trial.

Article activity feed