Genome-wide identification and molecular characterization of the MAPK family members in sand pear (Pyrus pyrifolia)

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: ‘Whangkeumbae’, a highly regarded variety of sand pear, is celebrated in the market for its distinctive and superior flavor. However, the rapid production of ethylene after harvest significantly shortens its shelf life, becoming a major limiting factor for enhancing its commercial value. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), a highly conserved family of transferases in eukaryote. Although the importance of this family has been extensively studied in other plants, the precise composition and functional mechanisms of MAPK members in sand pear remain elusive. Results: This study conducted an in-depth analysis of four PpMAPK genes identified in the transcriptome of the ‘Whangkeumbae’( Pyrus pyrifolia ) and 22 PpMAPKs in the Pyrus pyrifolia genome, demonstrating a high degree of concordance between the transcriptomic and genomic data. Specifically, the transcriptomic PpMAPK3-L (GenBank accession number: PP992971), PpMAPK7-L(GenBank accession number: PP992972), PpMAPK10-L (GenBank accession number: PP992973), and PpMAPK16-L (GenBank accession number: PP992974) exhibited sequence homology values of 99.19%, 100%, 94.51%, and 95.75%, respectively, with their corresponding genomic counterparts (EVM0007944.1, EVM0004426.1, EVM0027166.1, EVM0023771, EVM0028755.1, EVM0015862.1). These findings indicate that the integrated analysis of transcriptomic and genomic data provides critical genetic insights into the MAPK genes in sand pear, culminating in the identification of a total of 25 PpMAPK genes in this species. Further phylogenetic analysis classified these genes into four subfamilies (A, B, C, and D), with subfamilies A and B each comprising six members, subfamily C with four members, and subfamily D with nine members. The potential functional differences among the gene members of each subfamily provide valuable clues for future research into MAPK signaling pathways. Additionally, interaction analysis revealed a significant interaction between PpMAPK3-L and PpbZIP2, which coordinatively regulate the senescence traits of fruits in sand pear through their joint influence during the senescence process. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that PpMAPK3-L , PpMAPK7-L , PpMAPK10-L , and PpMAPK16-L are likely to play pivotal roles in the maturation and senescence of sand pear fruit. Specifically, the interaction between PpMAPK3-L and PpbZIP2 could play a key role in the regulation of fruit senescence, indicating that the MAPK signaling pathway may modulate the fruit's physiological state through interactions with transcription factors. This finding offers significant insights for further investigation into the functions of MAPK genes in the maturation and senescence of sand pear fruit and provides a new direction for investigating biotechnological approaches for delaying senescence and prolonging shelf life.

Article activity feed