Different Psychological Interventions for Perinatal Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Psychological interventions are the preferred treatment for women with perinatal depression, but there is a lack of comprehensive meta-analyses evaluating their effectiveness and the impact of related variables. Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of psychological interventions for perinatal depression and to examine the influence of associated variables. Methods: We systematically searched the Ovid platform, covering the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases from their inception to March 11, 2024. Results: We screened 5,827 articles, and 33 were included in a random-effects meta-analysis. Compared to the control groups, psychological interventions showed a moderate pooled effect size (SMD: -0.65; 95% CI: -0.87 to -0.43, moderate certainty of evidence). Subgroup analyses revealed that individualized interventions were more effective than group-based approaches. Additionally, interventions delivered in non-clinical settings were more effective than those in clinical settings. It was also observed that non-specialist therapists, who were professionally trained, achieved outcomes comparable to those of specialist therapists in treating perinatal depression. The effectiveness of different psychological interventions varied, with IPT demonstrating a larger effect size compared to CBT. Limitations: The limited number of studies on MBI, BA and PST may affect the accuracy of the meta-analysis results. Conclusions: IPT, CBT, MBI, and BA have been shown to effectively alleviate perinatal depression, while PST did not demonstrate significant efficacy. Notably, IPT outperformed the other interventions. Additionally, personalized interventions in non-clinical settings proved more beneficial. Furthermore, trained non-mental health professionals also achieved positive outcomes when delivering psychological interventions.

Article activity feed