E-Learning as an Alternative to Face-to-Face Teaching in Postgraduate Medical Education in a Resource-Limited Setting: Lessons from the COVID- 19 Pandemic – Experience from a Tertiary Teaching Hospital in Ethiopia

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background The need for applying physical distancing in the era of COVID-19 greatly hampered conventional face-to-face classroom teaching. This necessitated the incorporation of electronic learning (E-learning) in postgraduate medical education to ensure training continuity of residency programs. However, the perception of medical residents towards this new E-learning approach is not well studied. We assessed the perceived satisfaction of residents and the barriers to implementing E-learning in postgraduate medical education. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study from July 1 to December 30, 2020, among 200 residents from the departments of Internal Medicine, Surgery, Orthopedics, Neurology, and Obstetrics andGynecology (OBGYN) at the School of Medicine of Addis Ababa University. Self-administered questionnaires were used tocollect data on perception of E-learning and factors that affected it. Data were entered using Epidata and analyzed using Stata 14.0. Factor analysis determined 21 items from six components explained 65% of data variation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was fitted to identify factors associated with the six components of satisfaction. Results Among the 200 participants, 71.5% were male; 35.5% and 29.5% were from the Surgery and Internal Medicine departments, respectively. The median age of the participants was29 years. Only 24% of the participants had prior E-learning experience before the pandemic, and 15.5% reported spending > 10% of their salary to access the internet for academic purposes. About half (51.5%) of the participants reported satisfaction with E-learning, and 43% supported that E-learning improved teacher-learner collaboration. Satisfaction with E-learning was less among Surgery and OBGYN residents compared to residents from Internal Medicine [AOR:0.3;95% CI 0.11–0.85] and [AOR:0.1;95% CI 0.03–0.4], respectively. In addition, high internet cost, using a mobile device for internet access, poor computer skills, and lack of prior E-learning exposure were all negatively associated with perceived E-learning experience Conclusion Experiences of residents and their perceptions on E-learning were mixed. E-learning as a substitute to face-to-face classroom learning was unpopular especially among Surgery and OBGYN residents. Several barriers to E-learning were identified. We recommend university departments to tailor E-learning teaching methods and interventions and improve infrastructure and resident computer skills to enhance current E-learning experiences. Clinical Trial Number: Not Applicable

Article activity feed