Life Cycle Assessment of Micro-Activated Flux Tungsten Inert Gas Welding and Conventional Tungsten Inert Gas Welding: A Case Study
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Welding methods and equipment have evolved over the years with advancements in human lifestyles and environmental needs. Among these, Conventional Gas Tungsten Inert Gas (C-TIG) Welding stands out because of its specialized applications and is recognized for its importance in manufacturing. However, the low depth of penetration (DOP) in thick sheet metals has necessitated the development of assisted methods, such as activating fluxes in the Activated TIG (A-TIG) process. This study conducts a comparative sustainability analysis of A-TIG and C-TIG welding processes. A-TIG utilizes a TiO₂-based flux to enhance weld penetration. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed using the Ecoinvent 3 database and EPD 2018 and ReCiPe 2016 Endpoint (H) methodologies. Results indicate that A-TIG exhibits higher impacts in photochemical oxidation and water scarcity due to TiO₂ flux preparation and methanol usage. C-TIG shows higher impacts in acidification, eutrophication, global warming potential (GWP), abiotic depletion of elements (ADE), abiotic depletion of fossil fuels (ADF), and ozone layer depletion because its energy-intensive nature requires 70% more electricity. Endpoint modeling identifies human health as the most affected category, with C-TIG contributing 62% more damage due to emissions and energy use. Despite A-TIG’s improved energy efficiency and weld quality, its flux reliance introduces specific environmental trade-offs. This research highlights the need to balance weld quality and ecological sustainability for greener manufacturing practices.