Assessing FilmArray Pneumonia+ Panel dynamics during antibiotic treatment to predict clinical success in ICU patients with ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multicenter prospective study

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Accurate microbiological documentation seems central for managing severe pneumonia. While the FilmArray® Pneumonia + panel (FA-PP) offers rapid pathogen identification, its effectiveness during antibiotic treatment and in predicting clinical outcomes remains unclear. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study across four ICUs from April 2022 to June 2024, including patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) or ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia (vHAP). Bacterial loads were monitored on days 0, 1, 3, 7 and 10 and 3 days after stopping antibiotics, using endotracheal aspirates (ETAs) analyzed by FA-PP and standard cultures. The main objective was to assess the correlation between quantitative changes in FA-PP results and clinical success. Quantitative changes over time were analyzed using mixed ordinal logistic regression. Results Of the 93 patients enrolled, 60.2% (n = 56) achieved clinical success, while the ICU mortality rate was 25.8% (n = 24). Although FA-PP and culture quantification results declined over time (p < 0.0001), neither method consistently correlated with clinical success (non-significant for both). At diagnosis, FA-PP showed excellent diagnostic performance compared to culture, with a sensitivity of 94% [95% CI: 87–97] and a specificity of 98% [95% CI: 97–98]. Quantitative concordance improved with higher DNA copies, from 22.9% at the culture threshold at 10⁴ DNA copies/ml in FA-PP to 100% at ≥ 10⁷ DNA copies/ml. Diagnostic performance remained stable during antibiotic treatment with 94% sensitivity and 95% specificity in follow-up ETAs. Conclusions FA-PP provides rapid and accurate diagnostics but does not predict clinical outcomes during treatment, indicating limited utility for repeated testing in patient management.

Article activity feed