Decoding Workplace Stress: A Comprehensive Analysis of Demographic Correlations, Occupational Dynamics, and Intervention Strategies

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Workplace stress strongly affects employee well-being and organizational performance in high-stakes fields such as health care. The implementation of successful therapies depends on an awareness of the elements causing stress, including demographic elements and occupational traits. Focusing on age, job position, and employment length, this study examined the frequency and factors of workplace stress among King Saud University Medical Centre staff members. Objectives The main goal of this study was to assess the distribution of occupational stress levels among employees and identify important demographic and occupational correlates of stress. This research aimed to offer practical information to enhance occupational health campaigns and create a conducive workplace. Methods A total of 450 King Saud University Medical Centre staff members completed a cross-sectional survey. Using a standard scoring system, the survey evaluated stress levels and compiled demographic information such as age, job title, and employment duration. Low (0–3 points), moderate (4–9 points), and high (10–20 points) stress levels were assigned categories. Descriptive statistics were used to compile the information, and chi-square tests were used to assess the relationships between demographic factors and stress levels. Results While 41.3% of the individuals reported moderate stress, 7.3% experienced high stress, and most reported low stress—51.3%. Age and stress level were strongly correlated (p = 0.004; employees between the ages of 26 and 40 were most sensitive to both moderate and severe stress). With respect to stress (p = 0.001), employment duration also exhibited a notable correlation, indicating that younger workers were more stressed than were their more experienced colleagues. While employment status did not indicate statistically significant stress variation (p = 0.179), nurses accounted for the largest group experiencing various stress levels. Conclusion The results draw attention to important stress patterns, especially for nurses, younger workers, and mid-career professionals. It is essential to address these pressures by means of customized interventions, such as mentoring programs, supportive supervision, and systemic organizational reforms. The King Saud University Medical Centre can improve employee well-being and service quality by means of a strong workforce, therefore creating a better and more efficient workplace. Future research should include more professional group representations to enhance knowledge and guide focused initiatives.

Article activity feed