When Robots are Surprising: The Role of Cue Diagnosticity in Judging Robot Competence

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Previous research showed people’s explicit (vs. implicit) competence impressions were more sensitive to a robot’s single inconsistent (“oddball”) behavior. We report nine pre-registered studies (N = 3,735 online participants) testing the scope and underlying causes of this dissociation. We found that the dissociation (a) generalized to industrial robots, surgical robots, and self-driving cars; (b) replicated with structurally aligned direct and indirect measures of competence; and (c) is at least partially explained by the inconsistent evidence’s diagnosticity. We discuss implications for social cognition and human-robot interaction.

Article activity feed