Nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line treatment in advanced biliary tract cancer: results of a multicentre, randomised, phase II trial

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: the efficacy and safety of conventional first-line chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of advanced biliary tract carcinomas (ABTCs) have been unsatisfactory. Objectives: We aimed to explore alternative chemotherapeutic regimens capable of providing a better efficacy and fewer side effects. Design: Multicentre, randomised, phase II clinical trial Methods : Eligible patients with unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic biliary system tumours diagnosed by pathology or cytology between January 2021 and November 2022 were included. The participants were randomised to either a gemcitabine-cisplatin group (GC) or an albumin-paclitaxel-cisplatin group (NC). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary outcome, whereas overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were the secondary outcomes. Results : The trial enrolled 75 patients and had a median follow-up period of 11 months. The median PFS (mPFS) was 7.8 m (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.4–14.0 m) in the NC group, and 7.0 m (95%CI: 3.9–10.1 m) in the GC group (p=0.0034, hazard ratio [HR]=0.5136, 95%CI: 0.3136–0.8411). Median OS for the NC group was 12.4 m (95%CI: 7.3–22.3 m) and for the GC group was 12.1 m (95%CI: 6.7–20.7 m), with no significant differences (p=0.4592, HR=0.811, 95%CI: 0.463–1.442). PFS rates at 6 and 8 months were 48.24% vs. 70.8% and 8.51% vs. 32.0% for the NC and the GC group, respectively (p < 0.05). Regarding safety, although patients from both groups experienced thrombocytopenia, those in the NC group demonstrated significantly lower rates (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the GC group, the NC group showed a significantly increased mPFS, in addition to higher PFS rates at 6 and 8 months. Furthermore, the NC group showed lower haematological toxicity. This suggests that paclitaxel-based regimens may be a viable alternative for first-line treatment of ABTCs. Registration: Clinical Trials.gov identifiers: NCT04692051. Registered October 31, 2018 (Web Links -https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=38440)

Article activity feed