Prostatic surgery with preservation of the supramonticular tissue versus standard surgery in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: To compare modified surgery with supramonticular tissue preservation versus standard prostate surgery. Methods: For this systematic review, we conducted searches in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies that compared modified surgery with standard surgery were included. Two reviewers independently selected the studies. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4, and the GRADE approach was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. Results: We identified six studies (three RCTs and three quasi-experimental) with 336 participants. The meta-analyses showed that the modified technique may result in greater preservation of antegrade ejaculation (OR=3.12; 95% CI: 2.31 to 4.20) and may increase post-micturition residual volume (OR=4.54; 95% CI: -20.83 to 29.91). Additionally, it may have no effect on IPSS, maximum flow, and QoL. However, all these results had very low certainty of evidence. Conclusion: In patients undergoing endoscopic surgery for BPH, surgery performed with the modified technique (preserving supramonticular tissue 1 cm above the verum montanum) may result in increased preservation of antegrade ejaculation, may increase post-micturition residual volume, and may have no effect on IPSS, maximum flow, and QoL. However, the evidence for these effects is very uncertain.

Article activity feed