Angiogenesis Related Gene Signatures Predict Prognosis and Guide Therapeutic Strategies in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background Kidney tumors are hypervascular tumors with crucial antiangiogenic effects in tumor therapy. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for kidney renal clear cell carcinoma(KIRC) by utilizing angiogenesis-related genes to formulate targeted therapy and immunotherapy strategies. Methods Angiogenesis-related genes were screened via the GeneCard and Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB). The KIRC data downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were randomly divided into an experimental cohort and a validation cohort. In the experimental cohort, a risk score prediction model was constructed through successive analyses via univariate Cox regression, LASSO regression, and multivariate Cox regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to assess the sensitivity of the model's predictions. The model's stability and generalizability were subsequently validated in both the validation cohort and the E-MTAB-1980 cohort.Subsequently, the TCGA-KIRC dataset was stratified into two distinct groups: a localized tumor cohort and a progression/metastasis cohort, based on tumor staging criteria. The efficacy of the prognostic prediction model was evaluated within each subgroup.A nomogram model was developed in conjunction with each independent prognostic factor to accurately predict patient outcomes. Additionally, single-cell and intercellular communication analyses were conducted via KIRC single-cell data obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The effects of immunotherapy and targeted therapy on patients were predicted via prognostic modeling. Results A total of 260 angiogenesis-related genes were identified through screening in the GeneCards and Molecular Signatures Database(MSigDB). We subsequently developed a risk model comprising five genes: MEOX2, PLG, PROX1, TEK, and TIMP1. Survival analysis indicated that the prognosis for high-risk patients was significantly poorer than that for low-risk patients (P<0.001), and the model demonstrated satisfactory accuracy in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates. This finding was further validated in both internal and external validation cohorts.The model demonstrated applicability for prognostic predictions in both the localized tumor cohort and the progression/metastasis cohort, with proficiency in forecasting the prognosis of patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cancer. The AUC values for 1, 3, and 5 years were recorded at 0.691, 0.709, and 0.773, respectively. We successfully constructed a nomogram model to facilitate accurate prognostic predictions for patients. Analysis of single-cell data revealed that PLG was expressed predominantly in tumor cell clusters, whereas TEK was highly expressed primarily in pericytes. TIMP1 was found to be highly expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells. In contrast, MEOX2 and PROX1 were highly expressed in specific cell clusters but presented low expression levels across the overall cell population. Cell communication analysis indicated that the modeling gene TEK was involved in the angiogenic pathway, with the interaction between the ligand ANGPT2 and the receptor ITGA5-ITGB1 being particularly prominent in this study. Furthermore, the immune dysfunction and rejection scores for high-risk patients within the non-localized renal cancer cohort were markedly elevated compared to those observed in the low-risk group. In terms of targeted pharmacological intervention, individuals classified in the low-risk group exhibited a heightened sensitivity to sorafenib. Conclusions The KIRC prognostic prediction model, which is based on five angiogenesis-related genes, demonstrated reliable performance, indicating that high-risk patients have a significantly poorer prognosis than low-risk patients do. The developed nomogrammodel effectively visualizes and accurately predicts patient prognosis. It is essential to highlight that individuals diagnosed with low-risk metastatic KIRC may experience greater advantages from the administration of immunotherapy and sorafenib.