How RAG1/2 evolved from ancestral transposases to initiate V(D)J recombination without transposition

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The RAG1/2 recombinase, which initiates V(D)J recombination in jawed vertebrates, evolved from RNaseH-like transposases such as Transib and ProtoRAG 1 . However, its post-cleavage transposase activity is strictly suppressed. Previous structural studies have focused only on the conserved core domains of RAG1/2, leaving the regulatory mechanisms of the non-core regions unclear. To investigate how RAG1/2 suppresses transposition and regulates DNA cleavage, we determined cryo-EM structures of nearly full-length RAG1/2 complexed with cleaved Recombination Signal Sequences (RSS) in a Signal-End Complex (SEC), at resolutions up to 2.95 Å. Two key structures, SEC-0 and SEC-PHD, reveal distinct regulatory roles of RAG2, which is absent in Transib transposase. SEC-0 displays a closed conformation, revealing that the core RAG2 facilitates sequential DNA cleavage by stabilizing the RSS-cleaved states in a "spring-loaded" mechanism. SEC-PHD reveals how RAG2’s non-core PHD and Acidic Hinge (AH) domains, which are absent in ProtoRAG, inhibit target DNA binding in transposition. Histone H3K4me3, which recruits RAG1/2 to RSS sites, does not influence RAG1/2 binding to V, D or J gene segments bordered by RSS 2 . In contrast, the suppressed transposition can be activated by H3K4me3 peptides that dislodge the inhibitory PHD domain 3,4 . To achieve this de-repression in vivo, however, would require an unlikely close placement of two nucleosomes flanking a target DNA bent by nearly 180°. Our structural and biochemical results elucidate how RAG1 has acquired RAG2 and utilizes its core and non-core domains to enhance V(D)J recombination and suppress transposition.

Article activity feed