Beyond BMI: A Clearer Choice of Flouroscopic Guided PCNL Over USG-PNL in Cases of Central Obesity

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effect of waist circumference (WS) on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) compared with body mass index (BMI) in different access techniques: fluoroscopy (FPNL), and ultrasonography (UPNL). Methods: 109 patients were enrolled in the study in two different centers (63, FPNL-46, UPNL). After investigating the basic 24 parameters, Subgroups were analyzed based on WS ≥ 90 cm and BMI ≥ 30. CT scans determined the stone-free rate (SFR); less than 4 mm stones were accepted as relative SFR. The difficulty level of access was determined using the number of attempted access (NAA) and access times (AT). Results: Success rates were similar between the groups. In the UPNL group, X-ray time and NAA were lower, but AT was higher (p: 0.018, p: 0.012, p: 0.005, respectively). In the UPNL group, having a BMI ≥30, only prolonged AT, p: 0,029, but having WS ≥ 90 prolonged AT, NAA, and operation time, p< 0.01. In FGPNL, however, WS and BMI did not affect access parameters. In a linear regression analysis, WS and dilatation level predict access time and NAA (p: 0,003 and p: 0,015). Absolute SFR was similar between the groups, with 44,4 % for FPNL and 41,3 % for UPNL, without being affected by BMI and WS. Conclusion: Even if UPNL is safer regarding radiation exposure, it can be challenging in central obesity. Waist circumference may be a more reliable predictor of this issue than BMI. Despite having similar success rates, FGPNL might be preferable for these patients.

Article activity feed