Addition of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Advancing toward quadruplet induction regimens? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: The addition of CD38-targeted monoclonal antibodies, such as daratumumab and isatuximab, to standard treatment regimens has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). However, the benefits in specific subgroups, particularly high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) defined by cytogenetic abnormalities, remain controversial. Method: We conducted a systematic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify studies comparing induction regimens with and without anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies in NDMM. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status rate and PFS, stratified by cytogenetic risk. Result: A total of 5193 patients (863 patients were HRMM) in 10 randomized clinical trials were included. Of these, 2,677 patients received induction regimens containing anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, while 2,516 were treated with the same backbone regimens without the antibody. The addition of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody significantly increased the MRD-negative status rate in both transplant-eligible (TE) NDMM patients (pooled odds ratio [OR], 2.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72–3.10) and transplant-ineligible (TIE) NDMM patients (pooled OR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.18–5.67). Furthermore, the MRD-negative status rates improved for both HRMM (pooled OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.39–2.91) and standard-risk multiple myeloma (SRMM) patients (pooled OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.87–4.58). Additionally, PFS was markedly enhanced in patients treated with anti-CD38 antibody compared to those receiving backbone regimens alone, for both TE NDMM patients (pooled hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.38–0.69) and TIE NDMM patients (pooled HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43–0.62). Subgroup analyses indicated similar PFS benefits for both HRMM (pooled HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42–0.90) and SRMM patients (pooled HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.28–0.52). Conclusion Our findings suggest that the addition of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody to induction regimens enhances the MRD-negative status rate and improves PFS in NDMM patients, regardless of cytogenetic risk.

Article activity feed