Physicochemical properties and biological interaction of calcium silicate-based sealers - in vivo model

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate volumetric changes, in vivo biocompatibility, and systemic migration from eight commercial materials in paste/paste, powder/liquid, and pre-mixed forms. Material and Methods: After characterisation, tubes were implanted in Wistar rats’ alveolar bone and subcutaneous tissues. Micro-CT evaluated volumetric changes pre/post 30 days of implantation. Histological and immunohistochemistry analyses assessed biocompatibility. Kidney samples underwent spectrometry (ICP-MS) for tantalum, tungsten and zirconium. Statistical analysis determined normality and significance (p < 0.05). Results: Characterisation revealed calcium, silicon, and radiopacifiers in the materials. Volumetric changes showed greater alteration in subcutaneous tissues than alveolar bone; BioRoot RCS and MTApex (powder/liquid) were most stable. Histological analysis indicated intense inflammation for AH Plus Jet, moderate for others; IL-10 was marked positively for all materials. Unexpectedly, AH Plus Jet had an 18-fold higher tungsten and a 37-fold higher zirconium mass fraction in kidneys versus controls, while tantalum showed lower accumulation patterns. Conclusion: Root canal filling materials’ responses varied by implantation site and form, demonstrating acceptable biocompatibility. Tantalum and zirconium oxide radiopacifiers appear systemically safe; tungsten-based radiopacifiers are unsuitable due to metal accumulation risks. Clinical Relevance: This study highlights the need for further in vivo studies on endodontic sealers’ chemical, biological, and physical behaviors and their systemic migration.

Article activity feed