Comparison of the Correlation Between Cerebral [18F]FDG Metabolism as Assessed by Two Asymmetry Indices and Clinical Neurological Score in Patients with Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Purpose
Two types of asymmetry index (AI) have been utilized in evaluating cerebral function in ischemic cerebrovascular disease, however, few data exist on the differences between these AI measures. This study aimed to compare the two AIs in assessing PET cerebral metabolism and their correlation with clinical scales, to explore their potential value and applications in clinical settings.
Procedures
Seventy patients diagnosed with subacute and chronic ischemic stroke were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent 2-deoxy- 2-[ 18 F]fluoro-D-glucose ([ 18 F]FDG) PET/MR scans and were assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Nineteen patients underwent a repeat [ 18 F]FDG PET/MR scan one year later. Two voxel-wise AI methods, designated as AI 1 and AI 2 , were calculated based on standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR). The hypometabolism on affected side assessed by different AI methods were compared. The correlations between the hypometabolism and the clinical scores were analyzed.
Results
The volume and percentage of decreased [ 18 F]FDG metabolism assessed by AI 2 was larger than that obtained from AI 1 (all p < 0.0001). The correlation coefficients between the clinical scores and the decreased metabolism in temporal and parietal lobes assessed by AI 1 method were all higher than those from AI 2 . In addition, the improved follow-up patients showed more pronounced metabolic improvement as assessed by AI 1 .
Conclusions
The assessment of cerebral [ 18 F]FDG metabolism in patients with unilateral internal carotid/middle cerebral artery steno-occlusion to reflect clinical neurological function using the AI 1 method demonstrated superior performance in comparison to the AI 2 method.
