Understanding Pathogenic Detection Rates of CNVs in Prenatal Diagnosis: Insights from a Cohort Study
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
The current study aimed to explore the clinical utility of CNV-seq in prenatal diagnosis by comparing the pathogenic detection rates of copy number variants (CNVs) in pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis for various indications and across different CNV fragment sizes. A total of 1,118 pregnant women who received CNV-seq testing were included in the cohort and categorized into eight groups (Groups A to H) based on their testing indications, with the mixed group (Group H) serving as the reference. The top three groups with the highest pathogenic detection rates were high-risk NIPT (Group A), parental chromosomal abnormalities (Group D), and high-risk trisomy 18 (Group F), with detection rates of 92.16% (141/153), 80% (4/5), and 70% (14/20), respectively. The pathogenic CNV detection rate in our reference group (Group H) was 69.02% (127/184). A binary logistic regression analysis comparing the other seven groups against Group H showed that the detection rate in Group A was significantly higher than that in Group H (P < 0.05), while Groups B, C, E, and G had significantly lower detection rates. Furthermore, based on CNV fragment size, cutoffs were established at 1 Mb and 5 Mb, and the study cohort was further divided into four groups (Groups I to IV). Using the group with multiple CNVs (Group IV) as the reference, the pathogenic detection rates for each group were calculated. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that Group I had a significantly lower detection rate than Group IV (P < 0.05), while Group III exhibited a significantly higher detection rate (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that abnormal NIPT results are often associated with a higher pathogenic detection rate, and larger CNV fragments exceeding 5 Mb are more likely to be pathogenic. This study provides crucial insights into the clinical application of CNV-seq in prenatal diagnosis, emphasizing the importance of abnormal NIPT results and CNV fragment size in clinical interpretation, thereby facilitating more accurate prenatal risk assessment.