Strategic Decision-Making in Higher Education Learning Management System Adoption using hybrid intuitionistic fuzzy Method

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

In the context of higher education institutions, the adoption of learning management systems (LMS) represents a critical strategic decision, influenced by complex factors and evolving pedagogical practices. As the digitalization of education accelerates, administrators face the challenge of selecting the most suitable LMS solution amidst a plethora of options. This paper proposes a novel approach to address this challenge, leveraging the intuitionistic fuzzy (IF) criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC)This work suggests a novel ranking order strategy that combines the IF criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) -alternative ranking order method accounting for two-step normalization (AROMAN) Method. This technique aims to overcome this hurdle. Method. Drawing upon insights from multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), this methodology offers a systematic framework for evaluating LMS alternatives while accounting for the inherent uncertainties and subjectivities in the decision-making process.The AROMAN technique—which conducts two-step normalization in an IFenvironment is coupled with the CRITIC paradigm, which examines intercriteria correlations, to improve complicated and uncertain decision-making. The advantages of the suggested approach are shown via an LMS case study. This case study shows how the suggested approach advances open decision-making, consistency, and strategic alignment. The study offers a strong basis for decision-making addressing problems with the use of LMS in higher education. This gift facilitates the digitization of learning surroundings.

Article activity feed