Does hip bone morphology differ depending on the presence of Cam lesions in Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip?
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objective. The purpose of this study was to divide patients with borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH) into two groups according to the presence of Cam lesions, and compare radiographs related to bone morphology between them. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with BDDH who underwent hip arthroscopy (HA) or periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) at our institution between October 2013 and October 2019. The patients were classified into two groups according to the presence of Cam lesions. Radiographic measurements including lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), acetabular roof obliquity (ARO), cliff sign, femoral epiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index, vertical center anterior angle (VCA), and Sourcil Index were compared between the two groups. The cutoff values were calculated using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Results . Sixty-nine hips were analyzed in this study (Cam+: 34, Cam-: 35). The ARO and FEAR indexwere significantly higher in the Cam- group (P<0.001, P<0.001). The LCEA, VCA, and Sourcil Index was significantly lower in the Cam- group than that in the Cam+group (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001). The cut-off values were 21.0° for LCEA, 15.1° for the ARO, 22.5° for the VCA angle, -2.2° for the FEAR index, and 49.5° for the Sourcil Index Conclusion . Patients with BDDH exhibited significant differences in bone morphology depending on the presence of Cam lesions. Moreover, those without Cam lesions displayed similarities to patients with DDH. For such patients, performing HA alone risks poor clinical outcomes, and surgery to improve acetabular coverage, such as PAO, may be indicated.