Second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic not as deadly as speculated: Results from a large retrospective multicentric study of 26,405 patients in Mumbai, India

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

This retrospective multicenter study compared the demographic and clinical characteristics of hospitalized COVID-19 patients across two waves at select public hospitals in Mumbai. A total of 26,405 laboratory-confirmed cases were included, excluding patients transferred to other centers. Data analysis involved chi-square tests and multivariate binomial logistic regression. Both waves showed a male preponderance (64% in wave 1, 63% in wave 2, p=0.131) and a majority of patients over 35 years (77% in wave 1, 76% in wave 2, p=0.273). Despite a higher oxygen requirement in wave 2 (23% vs. 36%, p=0.001), the fatality rate was lower (13% vs. 9%, p=0.001). Symptom burden and comorbidities were significantly lower in wave 2. Kidney involvement (p=0.001) was the strongest predictor of oxygen requirement and death in wave 1, whereas age over 55 (p=0.001) was the most consistent predictor across both waves. Hypertension and/or diabetes (p=0.001) were associated with increased oxygen requirement but not death in both waves. In conclusion, while the age and gender distribution remained similar across both waves, wave 2 had a lower fatality rate and comorbidity burden despite a higher oxygen demand. The lower fatality rate in wave 2 stands out as a striking result in this large population study, contrary to earlier speculations. Age over 55 was a consistent predictor of both oxygen requirement and mortality, while hypertension and diabetes were only predictors of oxygen need.

Article activity feed