18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with malignant digestive system neoplasms: a head-to-head comparative study

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose Radionuclide-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) is an emerging tumor tracer. We sought to assess the uptake and diagnostic performance of 18 F-FAPI-42 PET/CT compared with simultaneous 2-deoxy-2[ 18 F]fluoro-D-glucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions in patients with malignant digestive system neoplasms and determine the potential clinical benefit. Procedures Forty-two patients (men = 30, women = 12, mean age = 56.71 ± 13.26 years) who underwent 18 F-FDG PET/CT and 18 F-FAPI-42 PET/CT simultaneously for diagnosis, staging, and restaging were enrolled. Quantitative data, including standardized uptake value (SUV), tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR), and tumor-to-blood pool ratio (TBR), were analyzed. Two independent readers performed a visual assessment of lesion number and location on PET/CT images. Interobserver agreement between two examinations was calculated using Cohen’s kappa (κ). Results Primary tumor locations included the liver (n = 20), stomach (n = 9), pancreas (n = 5), and intestine (n = 10). More intense 18 F-FAPI-42 uptake and higher tumor-to-background contrast were detected in most primary and metastatic lesions compared with 18 F-FDG, contributing to improved diagnostic accuracy ranging from 95.24–100%. Moreover, additional lesions showing 18 F-FAPI-42 uptake in primary, locoregional and distant metastatic lesions were visualized, especially in multiple liver and peritoneal metastases. Patient-based interobserver agreement varied from moderate to strong, with suboptimal outcomes observed in primary tumors (κ = 0.441, P  = 0.01) and preferable results derived from metastatic liver and bone lesions (κ = 1 and 0.896, both P  < 0.01). 18 F-FAPI-42 PET/CT resulted in modified treatment strategies for 40.48% (17/42) of patients, while 18 F-FDG PET/CT led to altered therapeutic regimens in only 4.8% (2/42) of patients. Conclusions In selected patients with malignant digestive system neoplasms, our study shows that 18 F-FAPI-42 PET/CT is a promising and alternative tool for assessing primary tumors and metastases and aiding staging, restaging, and decision-making, with higher uptake and better lesion visualization compared with 18 F-FDG. In addition, it may shed light into the treatment selection and response assessment for FAP-targeted therapy or immunotherapy.

Article activity feed