The advisability of science fair project topic origins: a case study of learners from disadvantaged backgrounds
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
For learners from disadvantaged backgrounds with limited science fair-related skills, knowledge, and community support, investigating the advisability of various ways of arriving at a science fair project topic is needed. This mixed-methods case study uses questionnaire data and science fair awards regarding the engagement of 23 grade 9-10 learners in a year-long university-led intervention. Data analysis was conducted for four post-hoc determined topic-origin groups of these learners’ projects: internet, self, adult, and adult after the learner had displayed competence. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to determine whether each topic-origin group met the advisability criteria regarding learners’ perceptions of value and facilitators’ perceptions of feasibility. Each learner who was provided with a topic by an adult without first having displayed competence through designing a project of their choosing required unfeasibly high levels of facilitator input to remain in the programme. Generally, the greatest success was observed for the learners to whom an adult gave a topic after displaying competence. These findings and how the intervention was conducted are explained in terms of the four paradigms of learning and instructional design. A framework (Instruct-Expose-Explore-Formalise) for deriving science fair topics is suggested to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of similar interventions.