Evaluation of 3D-printed Porous titanium alloy versus Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical degenerative disease
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Study Design - Single-center retrospective cohort study. Purpose - To compare the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who have undergone multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with either 3D-printed titanium (TTN) or polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. Overview of Literature - ACDF with 3D-printed TTN or polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages is an effective surgery for patients with cervical radiculopathy/myelopathy. The advent of 3D-printed porous TTN cages and its microporous structure has contributed to diminished subsidence and improved osseointegration compared to PEEK. This study compares the long-term outcomes of both implants among patients who underwent a multi-level ACDF procedure. Methods – 96 patients underwent multilevel (2, 3, 4) ACDF surgery, of whom 66 and 30 received a PEEK and 3D-printed TTN interbody cage, respectively. Radiographic outcomes for fusion, cage migration, and subsidence were determined with cervical x-rays and analyzed with independent 2-sample T-test and χ2 test. Visual analog score (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) score were examined with repeated measure analysis of variance. Results - The TTN group reported diminished NDI scores compared to the PEEK group (6.74 ± 5.58 vs 11.29 ± 8.67, p = 0.017) 2 years postoperatively. Furthermore, patients with 3D-printed TTN implants had a significantly shorter duration to fusion at the distal operated level in 3-level ACDF procedures (12.0 ± 5.20 vs 19.1 ± 5.91) (p = .011). The two cohorts reported no statistically significant difference in fusion rates. Conclusions – 3D-printed TTN implants enhanced the time to bony fusion at distal levels relative to PEEK cages. Clinically, patients with 3D-printed TTN implants reported diminished NDI scores at 2 years postoperatively. Such findings highlight the difference in outcomes clinically and radiographically for PEEK and 3D-printed TTN implants that need to be considered in optimizing multilevel ACDF procedures.