Thiazide-associated hyponatremia: a retrospective cohort study comparing hydrochlorothiazide vs indapamide vs chlorthalidone

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Hyponatremia is a crucial complication of therapy with thiazide diuretics. Aim This study compares the epidemiological and biochemical profiles and hospital course of patients using hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), indapamide (INDA), and chlorthalidone (CTD) admitted with thiazide-associated hyponatremia. Method Retrospectively obtained data from the hospital’s digital registries. The epidemiological and biochemical parameters between the HCTZ, INDA, and CTD groups were compared. The correlation between dose and biochemical parameters in each group was performed. The thiazide groups without diuretic co-medication were compared (HCTZ vs INDA) and the correlation between dose and biochemical parameters in each group was performed. Results A comparison of the HCTZ (n = 135), INDA (n = 125), and CTD (n = 27) groups identified difference in serum potassium (s-K; p = 0.03). The hyponatremia correction rate was slower in the CTD group at 96 h after admission (p < 0.001). After the exclusion of diuretic co-medication, the HCTZ group (n = 64/135) showed a higher prevalence of ARBs, s-K (both p < 0.001) and a lower median (IQR) equipotent dose (12.5 (o) mg vs 2.5 (1.2) mg), prevalence of ACE-I (p < 0.001), and eGFR (p = 0.03), when compared to the INDA group (n = 109/125). Conclusion Except for s-K, we observed no significant difference in biochemical and epidemiological profiles between HCTZ, INDA, and CTD. After excluding the influence of other diuretics, we observed higher s-K in the HCTZ group compared to the INDA group, potentially explained by the lower equipotent dose of HCTZ. The CTD group showed a statistically significant trend of slower hyponatremia correction.

Article activity feed