The Predictive Value of Trendelenburg Position and Neck Ultrasound for Fluid Responsiveness in Prone ARDS Patients with VV-ECMO
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background In clinical practice, fluid administration is widely used to treat hypotension in patients undergoing veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). However, volume expansion (VE) may aggravate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and increase patient mortality, predicting fluid responsiveness is of great significance in the treatment of hypotension in patients undergoing VV-ECMO. Methods This prospective single-center study was conducted in a medical intensive care unit and included 51 VV-ECMO patients with ARDS in the prone position who required volume expansion due to hypotension. Stroke volume index variation (△SVI), carotid artery corrected flow time (FT c ), and artery peak velocity variation (ΔV peak ) were taken before and during the Trendelenburg position or Volume expason is given. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a volume expansion-induced increase in ΔSVI of ≥ 15%. Results 33 patients (64.7%) were identified as fluid responders. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for FT c and ΔV peak induced by the Trendelenburg position to predict fluid responsiveness were 0.866 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.755–0.977) and 0.833 (95% CI 0.716–0.949), respectively. The sensitivity at the optimal threshold of 331.5 ms for FTc was 84.85% (95% CI 69.1–93.4%), with a specificity of 83.33% (95% CI 60.8–94.2%). For ΔV peak , the sensitivity at the optimal threshold of 10.1% was 81.82% (95% CI 65.9–91.4%), with a specificity of 77.78% (95% CI 54.9–91.0%). The grey zone for FT c and ΔV peak included 29% and 45% of patients, respectively. Conclusions Changes in FT c and ΔV peak , monitored through neck ultrasound and induced by the Trendelenburg position, are reliable indicators for predicting fluid responsiveness in VV-ECMO patients with ARDS in the prone position. Furthermore, FT c demonstrates superior predictive value compared to ΔV peak .