View of healthcare professionals on ultra-rapid genome sequencing and its future implementation in clinical practice for critically ill children

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The clinical utility of ultra-rapid genome sequencing (urGS) in neonatal and paediatric intensive care situations has been demonstrated, and barriers to its implementation in clinical practice studied. A 38-item questionnaire was distributed via medical professional learned societies to identify the views of French healthcare professionals in the field prior to its implementation. Overall, 116 responses were received: 35% from healthcare professionals working in clinical genetics, 19% in laboratory genetics, and 32% in paediatric or neonatal intensive care units (NICU/PICU). Nearly all (97%) respondents agreed that healthcare professionals should receive specific training before a first test order; 94% considered urGS useful, and 97% that the results would likely modify a decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. A multidisciplinary approval of the urGS request was considered necessary by 87% of respondents, and multidisciplinary discussion of the result by 84%; joint disclosing of results by a clinical geneticist and NICU/PICU physician was considered ideal for 91% of respondents, and 78% were against additional findings being disclosed at the same time as the result. For 99% of respondents, psychological assistance was crucial after the result. Based on the results, we propose a workflow to facilitate implementation in a broad range of centres.

Article activity feed