Effect of Microbial Interactions on Performance of Community Metabolic Modeling Algorithms: Flux Balance analysis (FBA), Community FBA (cFBA) and SteadyCom

To explore the impact of microbial interactions on outcomes from three prevalent algorithms (Flux Balance Analysis (FBA), community FBA (cFBA), and SteadyCom) analyzing microbial community metabolic networks, five toy community models representing common microbial interactions were designed. These include commensalism, mutualism, competition, mutualism-competition, and commensalism-competition. Various scenarios, considering different biomass yields and substrate constraints, were examined for each type. In commensal communities, all algorithms consistently produced similar results. However, changes in biomass yields and substrate constraints led to variable abundances and community growth rates within a broad range (0.33 to 0.8 and 2 to 5, respectively). For competitive communities, all algorithms predicted growth of fastest-growing member. To comply with the natural coexistence of members, suboptimal solutions over optimal point are recommended. FBA faced challenges in modeling mutualism, consistently predicting growth of only one member. Although cFBA and SteadyCom resulted in a lower community growth rate, coexistence of both members were satisfied. In toy models with dual interactions, more realistic outcomes were achieved contrary to purely competitive model as the dependency fosters the coexistence which was missing in the competitive only scenarios. These findings emphasize the importance of algorithm choice based on specific microbial interaction types for reliable community behavior predictions.​