Cross-cohort transcriptomic integration links neoadjuvant chemotherapy response to an inflammatory macrophage-epithelial program in muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Read the full article

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Only a subset of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) achieves a major pathological response to cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The cellular sources of pretreatment transcriptional programs associated with response remain incompletely resolved. Methods Two pretreatment clinical response cohorts, GSE212810 (21 responders and 18 non-responders) and GSE247185 (8 pathological complete responders and 5 non-pCR patients), were analyzed for cross-cohort response association, while the treatment-naive single-nucleus cohort GSE169379 (25 patients) was used for cellular attribution. Gene-level response statistics were calculated separately in each clinical cohort and combined using a directional sample-size-weighted Stouffer procedure. Hallmark programs were evaluated by preranked gene-set enrichment analysis. Concordant pathway leading edges were compared, and genes present in at least three leading edges were retained as a 20-gene core before cellular localization. Patient-within-sample comparisons avoided cellular pseudoreplication. Regimen restriction, leave-one-sample-out analyses, and adjustment for a basal-minus-luminal expression proxy were used as sensitivity analyses. Results TNF-alpha signaling via NF-kB was the strongest response-associated program in the cross-cohort meta-ranking (normalized enrichment score [NES] 2.574; permutation false discovery rate [FDR] < 1/5,000). Enrichment was concordant in GSE212810 (NES 1.713; FDR 0.00836) and GSE247185 (NES 2.539; FDR < 1/3,000). Interferon-gamma response, inflammatory response, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and IL6/JAK/STAT3 signaling were also positively enriched, whereas MYC targets V1 and E2F targets were negatively enriched in the meta-ranking. The five positively enriched leading edges yielded a 20-gene core represented in at least three programs. All 20 genes were detected in GSE169379. Patient-paired analysis localized this core to inflammatory macrophages (21 patients; mean paired difference 0.319; FDR 1.3x10^-5) and CDH12-positive epithelial cells (25 patients; mean paired difference 0.199; FDR 2.67x10^-4). PDPN-positive fibroblasts showed a positive but multiplicity-adjusted nonsignificant difference (15 patients; FDR 0.0603), while FAP- and PDGFRB-positive fibroblasts were unsupported. TNF/NF-kB enrichment remained positive in every leave-one-sample-out iteration in both response cohorts. After cohort standardization and adjustment for a basal-minus-luminal proxy, response remained associated with the inflammatory core (beta 0.534; HC3 P = 0.0353). Conclusions Conclusions: Pretreatment MIBC response to NAC was associated with a coordinated inflammatory program rather than a single-gene marker. Independent single-nucleus analysis localized the shared core predominantly to inflammatory macrophages and CDH12-positive epithelial cells. These observational findings require validation in larger prospective cohorts and functional studies.

Article activity feed