Public involvement across the UK’s research ecosystem at systems-level – results from the INTEGRATE study, a freedom of information-based survey
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Funding bodies in many countries mandate patient and public involvement (PPI) in research study development and delivery. However, the extent of systems-level public involvement in strategic decision-making is unclear. We report a UK-based mixed-methods study using Freedom of Information requests to examine PPI within executive-level boards that set health research strategy across universities, funders and NHS organisations. Of the 402 institutions that responded, 19.4% had PPI representation at executive level and 23.4% had a PPI advisory structure. Findings suggest that: 1) Health research strategy-setting boards are highly variable 2) executive-level PPI is more common in NHS organisations than universities and funders 3) in universities especially, most PPI is at study-level rather than systems level 4) some institutions found ways to involve the public at systems level. In the UK, systems-level PPI is least developed where the most significant strategic and funding decisions regarding research are made.