Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Complement Pathway Inhibition in Primary IgA Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the leading cause of primary glomerulonephritis globally¹. Activation of the alternative and lectin complement pathways plays a key pathophysiological role in driving glomerular inflammation, mesangial expansion, and podocyte loss¹,⁶. Although targeted complement inhibitors (e.g., C3, C5aR1, Factor B, MASP-2) have entered clinical evaluation²,³,⁴,⁵, pooled quantitative estimates of their therapeutic efficacy and safety remain to be comprehensively synthesized under formal systematic review frameworks. Methods: Registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024891023) and reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines⁸, a systematic search across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was executed from inception through 2024. Double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating targeted complement inhibitors against placebo or standard supportive care in biopsy-confirmed IgAN patients were included. Dual independent reviewers executed screening, data extraction, and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) assessments⁷. Primary outcomes evaluated percentage change in 24-hour urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes assessed eGFR slope preservation and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE framework. Results: Data from 8 double-blind RCTs comprising 892 randomized participants were synthesized²,³,⁴,⁵. Complement pathway inhibition was associated with a statistically significant reduction in 24-hour UPCR relative to control arms at 24 weeks (pooled weighted mean difference [WMD]: -40.2%, 95% CI: -46.9% to -33.5%, p < 0.001; I²= 38.4%)²,³,⁴,⁵. Subgroup analyses indicated that alternative pathway inhibition (Factor B blockade) yielded a WMD of -42.8% (95% CI: -49.5% to -36.1%)²,⁵. Complement inhibition was associated with favorable eGFR slope protection over 52 weeks (WMD: +2.8 mL/min/1.73 m²/year, 95% CI: +1.9 to +3.7, p < 0.001)²,³,⁵. Incidence of TEAEs was similar between groups (relative risk [RR]: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.13, p = 0.52)²,³,⁴,⁵. Based on GRADE criteria, the certainty of evidence was rated as Moderate for proteinuria and eGFR outcomes (downgraded for imprecision and surrogate outcome duration) and High for safety parameters. Conclusion: Available trial evidence indicates that targeted complement pathway inhibition reduces proteinuria and stabilizes short-term eGFR slopes in patients with primary IgA nephropathy without raising immediate safety concerns¹,²,³,⁴,⁵,⁶. Long-term event-driven trials remain necessary to confirm hard renal survival outcomes.

Article activity feed